Home

Call of Duty 4: Modern Warfare

ok

Written by GP from Westport

Aug 24, 2009

its asome but I think that it neeeds way more missions i mean i beat the game in 1 and a half days i mean call of duty it should be a lot of missions its a great game but i think it neeeds a lot more missons

6 of 41 people found this useful

Call of Duty 4: Modern Warfare

Not worth the $$

Written by RH from Upper Kingsclear

Jan 5, 2009

I'm with the other fellow. Waaaay too short!!!

Way to linear - forced through them - yes.

Don't bother wasting your dollars on this one.

Beautiful graphics and very stable, etc. but there are plenty of good graphics that are longer, and don't force you through.

8 of 52 people found this useful

Call of Duty 4: Modern Warfare

somewhat enthused

Written by WM from Oakland

Dec 4, 2008

After waiting for a good amount of time for this to finally be ported to OSX. Somewhat fizzled on the outcome. That may only be because of the heavy GPU draw and inefficient use of texturing / gameplay priority allocation. The game is pretty fast paced, which is nice, hands down it's a good single player shooter, but there could have been something done about GPU coding & requirements.
If you play this game with VERY BASIC settings, with a GREAT network connection, you'll get away with about an 80% satisfaction rating on game play, IF you're not picky.
If you are, do not install this on a laptop, go straight to a tower with a 250mb card or above. (minimal)
Just as a comparison, quake wars enemy territory can be turned up to about 75% of the games settings on multi-player and mildly skip, this game if you go above MINIMAL settings you'll start hopping frames.
Hope this helps.

18 of 33 people found this useful

Call of Duty 4: Modern Warfare

Logitech Dual Action Will Not Work...

Written by DW from Henryetta

Nov 30, 2008

Amazing game, my all time favorite on a console so I bought it and the logitech dual action controller to extend my play to my new MBP and my new 24" LED Display, not the case. The game does not recognize a gamepad, from which I have tried several, for me the game seems to work with a gamepad instead of a keyboard and mouse. I feel that the developers should have designed that into the game, and maybe they will release a patch in due time. I would not have purchased either item with that knowledge. If anyone has a resolve please feel free to contact me so I can begin to play on my MAC as well... The game gets a 5 out of 5, the controls get a 1 star.

13 of 23 people found this useful

Call of Duty 4: Modern Warfare

Yes, multiplayer is fantastic...

Written by EE from Warner

Oct 20, 2008

The multiplayer is really what makes this game; Its frantic action and awesome rewards system creates one of the better experiences I've had playing video games.
However, I've been having trouble finding full servers, so the mp isn't really living up to its full potential.

The single player, on the other hand, is disappointing. I beat it in under 6 hours on normal and I'm pretty bad at games like this. There are some jaw-dropping moments, moments which really got my heart beating faster, but they aren't enough to make me recommend this game as a single player experience.

The graphics are incredible...but they suffer from frequent glitches that mar the general believability of the action. These glitches include bizarre, inverted reflections of the environment which can be seen in the heat rising from the flames, and bodies floating mid-air when shot off a balcony. These don't interfere with the gameplay...they're just minor annoyances.

This game is good...but is it 55 dollars good? Buy Call of Duty 2 for ten bucks on ebay and spend the rest of your money on something worthwhile...or wait until Aspyr comes out with a patch and the multiplayer community has a little time to develop.

15 of 25 people found this useful

Call of Duty 4: Modern Warfare

Bad zoom

Written by IN from West Hills

Oct 11, 2008

When ever a scope something the scope turns blurry and you can't see the people very well. Other wise, good game

21 of 72 people found this useful