Home

  • 133-MAC
Mon-Sat 8:00am - 8:00pm EST
 

 
 

Customer Ratings

3.5

Based on 1492 reviews

  • Apple In-Ear Headphones with Remote and Mic

    5.0

    Simply amazing!

    Written by MB

    18/12/2008

    I'm an audio engineer with 18 years experience, well trained hearing, and I know my way around an IEC 711 coupler. Among other things, I've had extensive experience with high-end in-ear headphone design. So, I feel like I can offer some objective comments about the Apple In-Ear Headphones.

    Tone quality is nearly neutral - music comes through basically as it was recorded. The reproduction is brutally honest, and you will find that low bit-rates and bad recordings sound like what they are. The bass is definitely rock solid, and goes far below 20 Hz - but it is extremely tight and controlled. Those of you who expect unnaturally heavy, boomy bass may be disappointed. Mids are clean, transparent and smooth. The highs are amazingly extended, open and effortless. Audible distortion is vanishingly low, and dynamic range is excellent.

    Price/performance is simply unbeatable. These phones are absolutely capable of outperforming competitive models 4x the cost. That Apple is able to provide true 2-way dual balanced-armature phones, with this level of audio performance, at this price point, boggles the mind.

    Since these are in-ear phones, they must be inserted correctly to work. ANY air leak will kill bass performance and shift tone quality harshly toward the midrange. You must use the right eartips, your ear canals have to be reasonably close to a round shape, and clean (ie no tufts of hair, dried skin or earwax, etc.... ewwww, sorry) for a good, air-tight seal. If they are inserted too deep, or not deep enough, response will change and sound quality will suffer.

    Also because they are in-ear phones, some sound can be conducted through the cable and may become audible. Conductive sounds your body makes will be louder as well - chewing, breathing, swallowing and so forth are sometimes audible. For most people this is not a serious issue. Hearing aids and earplugs do this too.

    Yes, they're not compatible with everything, and that is a valid issue for those who would like to use their 3G iPhone with them. This is a known issue, and Apple details what products are fully compatible with these headphones. It could be that a software update will solve this problem - and even if it doesn't, you knew about it..... Quit griping.

    A stunning achievement, Apple. I am very impressed.

    6107 of 6690 people found this useful

    Was this useful?

    Flag as inappropriate

  • Apple In-Ear Headphones with Remote and Mic

    5.0

    Better than Sonys

    Written by JM from GREENVILLE

    24/12/2008

    I've been using a set of Sony MDR EX70LPs for about 5 years. Great product, once you get used to having a speaker jammed in your ear. I usually wound up fiddling with them a bit after 30 minutes of so, they seem to slightly irritate my ear.But the bass is so much better than conventional buds or phones (I've tried countless Sony, Yamaha, every brand under the sun). A few months ago, I wondered if Sony had improved the product any and bought a set of MDR-EX81LPs. Slightly better phones, but more awkward to wear.

    So when I heard I was getting an iPod touch for Christmas, I figured I would order a set of these and give them a shot. Got the phones two days before Christmas, decided to try them out on my 5g iPod. Plugged them in and turned on iTunes, awaiting sonic nirvana.

    But...no bass. None, zip, zilch, nada.
    OK, so, something isn't right. The medium rubber pieces seem a little loose, maybe I need to try the other ones. I open the capsule with the others...but they look smaller. Then I notice the label on the capsule, and pull open the other side, marked L, swap in the bigger rubber pieces, pop the phones back in, and...

    Oooooooooooh yeeeeeeaaaaaaah. That's what I was looking for. Some hip hop. Yep, plenty of bass. Norah Jones - perfect female vocals. Guns'n'Roses - guitar works.

    As is the case with all in-ears I've tried, they telegraph a lot of noise from wire movement, but that's controllable somewhat depending on how you wear them. And as another review pointed out, wearing them while eating will sound horrible.

    These are the best-sounding headphones I have ever owned. I haven't compared them to the Etymotic Research, but they are much more comfortable than either of the Sonys - I've had them in for an hour and haven't touched them.

    If you try these and can't stand in-ears, or if you have odd-sized or shaped ears, that's a shame. If you try them and think they don't have any bass, you need to try the larger pads - when they seal to your ear, these things go as low as any speaker I have ever heard, and I can't even begin to turn my iPod up all the way (though admittedly I don't have any hearing damage, as some other 35-year-olds do).

    2224 of 2695 people found this useful

    Was this useful?

    Flag as inappropriate

  • Apple In-Ear Headphones with Remote and Mic

    5.0

    Sweet music to my ears...

    Written by SG from Lakewood

    13/12/2008

    These are best earphones I've ever had. I've had sonys, the stock iPod buds, the previous generation of apple in-ear buds, and some others and by far these are purely AWESOME.

    On the first listen, I thought they were just OK, but after a while I truly got to experience all the different sounds and how well these earphones produced them. Bass is amazing (although, it seemed to need just a bit more boom - but that might just be me :) Treble is great too. These do seriously sound like several-hundred-dollar earbuds. Also, these are the MOST COMFORTABLE earphones ever. I almost don't even notice them in my ears - they are that amazing - while they still provide a firm fit so movement doesn't dislodge them.

    Packaging is beautiful, the additional silicone tips are a huge plus, and the added mesh caps are a nice touch.

    My only issue is the lack of volume control for iPhone. Hopefully that'll come at some point?


    1853 of 2272 people found this useful

    Was this useful?

    Flag as inappropriate

  • Apple In-Ear Headphones with Remote and Mic

    4.0

    stunning!!

    Written by MH from moseley

    15/12/2008

    Just picked these up from the applestore in Brum today.

    To clear things up, ALL features EXCEPT VOLUME CONTROL work fine with the original Iphone, pause, skip tracks, answer calls, microphone etc all work great, but you can;t control mic or headphone volume.

    Fantastic clarity for receiving and talking during calls, a lot better than most bluetooth sets.

    Real comfortable and secure fit, much more comfortable than any other phones I've used, and I've used about 10 different sets of phones over the last two years trying to find something that is comfortable and sounds great... and we have a winner!

    The sound is fantastic, given that I usually listen on in-ear single driver phones that cost me £120, I really do love the sound from these. Great soundstaging, and the clarity of the top end mixed with the warm and rolling bottom end is great, the 5hz claim I think is pushing it! THESE ARE NOT BASS HEAVY!

    I listen mostly to electronic and DNB, and although the bottom end is not that low and thumping, it is still very rich and warm, and very punchy with no distortion, but the level of clarity and detail you hear is amazing, you really can hear so much more detail in tracks than I was used too. Each element is very well defined, unlike the sharpness of some phones, or the mushiness of bass heavy sets, all elements are crystal clear here. I guess the dual drivers really work, hopefully the bottom end will pick up a bit once they're broken in.

    Basically for the money, you simply can't beat these phones. Amazing sound quality, loving the extra hands free use, the controls are as simple as you can get and they are very well made. You'll be paying at LEAST double if not treble for the next cheapest dual driver phones on the market. So you really can't go wrong... just a shame they're still white, silver or black would have looked much nicer, especially considering the lack of any white in the current apple product range!!

    Looks like Apple finally made a good set of earphones... shocking ;)

    612 of 707 people found this useful

    Was this useful?

    Flag as inappropriate

  • Apple In-Ear Headphones with Remote and Mic

    4.0

    Starting to Appreciate

    Written by CT from Bearsden

    15/12/2008

    Took a bit of getting used too, my ears had been conditioned to the Sennheiser CX300 in-ears, the Apple by comparison are noticeably flatter but more natural and very detailed. CX300s are bottom heavy, the Apple unit feels smooth up to the vocal presence range where it comes to life and towards the top end remains pretty sharp. I noticed overall good detail and separation, this should happen with two individual drivers handling different frequency ranges.
    Earphones will always be subjective, people have different music tastes but Im really starting to appreciate these earphones and getting away from the artificial sound I had become accustomed too. The fact you have playback control and a mic built in and its barely visible is another winner.

    389 of 478 people found this useful

    Was this useful?

    Flag as inappropriate

  • Apple In-Ear Headphones with Remote and Mic

    5.0

    The iPhone now has a new friend!

    Written by JW from Nottinghamshire

    24/12/2008

    Superb headphones. High Quality, separation, clarity, taut bass, detailed treble. Excellent and well worth the money. Mic works well on iPhone 2G and 3G models.

    Innovative case and ear plug holder.

    5 Stars because they beat all the earphones at this price level and some above.

    376 of 464 people found this useful

    Was this useful?

    Flag as inappropriate

  • Apple In-Ear Headphones with Remote and Mic

    5.0

    Definite Must Have

    Written by VT from Markham

    11/12/2008

    Just received mine in the mail today and these are the most comfortable and best-sounding in-ear headphones! For those wondering, the remote/mic work with the iphone 3G except the volume control

    309 of 389 people found this useful

    Was this useful?

    Flag as inappropriate

  • Apple In-Ear Headphones with Remote and Mic

    2.0

    Not for working out

    Written by BC from BEVERLY

    15/06/2009

    These headphones were the best for me up until I started to sweat during a workout. I am not sure what happened but the headphone became more sensitive and the remote would constantly pause when it would brush up against my cheek. It became really annoying to the point where I was spending more time fiddling with my iPhone than working out. It would be great if there was a way to disable the remote.

    207 of 238 people found this useful

    Was this useful?

    Flag as inappropriate

  • Apple In-Ear Headphones with Remote and Mic

    3.0

    I know i know, bass right?

    Written by MP from Edmond

    19/12/2008

    So I picked these up a couple days ago with fairly high expectations due to all the good comments. I really could go on and on about how much I love the design and comfort (most beautiful and comfortable in-ear's ever..), but I want to focus on one thing that many people have been disagreeing with. Bass.

    I honestly believe some of these headphones HAVE to be different. After reading reviews after I had listened to my headphones, I couldn't possibly understand how some people say these have sufficient bass. Now I know there are a lot of bass junky's out there, but I want to state that I am NOT one of them. I hate overloaded bass. I just like a good, powerful, equal sound. I am not joking here when I say my Apple in-ears sound like they have no bass. I know many of you will say my review was "unhelpful", but I am laying it straight out. I have owned probably 15 pair of headphones over the last 5 years, all between ($70 and $350)(I'm a freak for good sounding headphones), and my pair of Apple's sound very brittle.

    Part of me wants to exchange my pair for a new pair at the Apple Store because I don't understand how some people say these things even have a small but reasonable amount of bass. Mine has BARELY any. But, I would sound crazy telling someone at the store I thought that.

    All in all, i'm just disappointed.

    I will add this thought in though:
    The headphones sound fabulous with acoustic guitar and vocals. But once you get in to some drums or some rock guitar, it just sounds straight up weak.

    239 of 306 people found this useful

    Was this useful?

    Flag as inappropriate

  • Apple In-Ear Headphones with Remote and Mic

    5.0

    Almost as good as my $400 UE Triple-Fi

    Written by RJ from Flower Mound

    24/12/2008

    The title says it all. I've owned the Ultimate Ears Triple-fi canalphones for about two years now and they are the BEST! I needed a pair of less expensive ones to take to the gym, so I ordered these new ones from Apple. Wow! I'm blown away. The Apple In-Ear monitors are almost as good as my Triple-fi's which cost 5 times as much. And, the Apple ones are much more comfortable. Buy these. You'll be glad you did.

    182 of 211 people found this useful

    Was this useful?

    Flag as inappropriate

  • Apple In-Ear Headphones with Remote and Mic

    4.0

    Nice audio and fit, too bad no iPhone support

    Written by MP from Corbera de Llobregat

    9/12/2008

    The headphones sound really good, on par with others I've owned in the $100-$200 range. Good bass combined with a nice fit provide powerful sound, however if you are used to Shure-type audio (less bass) these will sound strange.

    The included replacement mesh covers are a nice touch which will come in handy when the built-in ones become dirty (and they will, from my experience with other headphones!). Also, smaller and larger buds are included in a nicely designed case so you can find the best fit for you.

    Biggest gripe is lack of volume support for the iPhone (both 2G and 3G), which to me seems like a huge oversight by the hardware designers - did they not know these headphones were coming?

    195 of 246 people found this useful

    Was this useful?

    Flag as inappropriate

  • Apple In-Ear Headphones with Remote and Mic

    2.0

    Unable to Work Out With Them

    Written by AH from Gilbert

    14/06/2009

    These earsphones were excellent producing quality sound when I first bought them. However, after working out with them they ceased to work properly and became eratic. They seem to work fine after drying out, but if you work up any sweat they fail. I notice I'm not the only one who have found the same problem. Serious design flaw!

    172 of 207 people found this useful

    Was this useful?

    Flag as inappropriate

  • Apple In-Ear Headphones with Remote and Mic

    5.0

    Unreal Sound! Unreal Price!

    Written by BB from Lubbock

    12/12/2008

    I'll start by saying that 1) I never take time to write reviews, but felt this was warranted and 2) I consider myself to be an audiophile, not just a casual listener.

    That being said I think that Apple really hit the mark with these. Dual Driver phones for $80 is unbelievable. These have crisp highs and a very defined midrange - not atypical of a headphone in this price range. The bass however, is a very different story. The 'previews' of these 'phones have all said that they seem to be lacking in bass. I completely disagree. The bass is very tight and pronounced. I am listening to Sade "By Your Side" right now and the kick drum is literally rattling my head. If you think it is going to sound like you are standing next to a subwoofer you might be let down slightly (90% of that bass is 'felt' not heard anyway), but the bass certainly beats anything anywhere near this price range that I've heard. They also respond really well to the EQ settings in itunes. Feel free to play with the low end - you dont get the distortion most other in ears get. Remember the key is getting a good seal with any IEM - the Apples do a great job of isolating me from the outside world - I can't even hear myself typing a a low volume.

    I can compare these to the Shure SE110 (dog chewed these up, a decent IEM) and the SE210s. I did some A/Bing with the Apple in ears against the 210s and the in ears won in every conceivable category - hands down. Bear in mind the 210s retail for $179. The 210s just do not come close to replicating the base these babies do!!!!

    I'm not going to even bother comparing these to the stock buds apple offers...

    134 of 151 people found this useful

    Was this useful?

    Flag as inappropriate

  • Apple In-Ear Headphones with Remote and Mic

    5.0

    Best

    Written by MH from CASTLE ROCK

    13/12/2008

    This month I was on a journey to get the headphones i liked best.
    And i have tried V- Moda vibe duos, V- moda vibe due 2s, Bose earbuds, And these and I absolutely love them out of all the ones I have tried.
    Absolutely Must Buy.

    131 of 162 people found this useful

    Was this useful?

    Flag as inappropriate

  • Apple In-Ear Headphones with Remote and Mic

    1.0

    Your mileage may vary

    Written by LS from Vancouver

    6/03/2009

    Despite very modest expectations, I was disappointed. No bass at all.

    I'm an audio engineer, so I know the difference between exaggerated bass and realistic reproduction. This wasn't a case of me wanting boom and the headphones delivering only neutrality. The bottom was just plain... missing.

    Having spoken to others who noted the same lack of bass I concluded that they must just be junk, but then I saw that other people, including another audio engineer, have written very positive reviews here. That means either the quality control is poor and some units sound good while others sound terrible, or, more likely, the shape of the earpiece works well with some ears and poorly with others.

    I would suggest that you listen before you buy if you can or make sure you buy them from a dealer with a decent return policy.

    129 of 164 people found this useful

    Was this useful?

    Flag as inappropriate

  • Apple In-Ear Headphones with Remote and Mic

    4.0

    Very portable headphones that get the job done

    Written by JU from Burbank

    13/12/2008

    My hopes for the Apple In-ear Headphones were (1) outside sound isolation, (2) portability and wearability and finally (3) sound for the (4) price.

    These earphones meet all my needs! They block out sound and yet are comfortable with their hollow, soft silicone covers. They are tiny and come with a handy carrying case to protect them; this case is much smaller than either ear piece from a pair of over-ear headphones. They stay secure in my ears, even when I catch the wire with my arm (sending my iPod flying). They are pretty affordable for the sound quality. The bass is decent, especially for the size; there is plenty of separation and richness, although they are lacking in the deep bass but that is no surprise. The mids are not too boomy and there is no noticeable distortion at any frequencies for as high of volumes I care to subject my ears to. They are little bit sharp in the highs (the letter s or a cymbal with stand out---better than being clipped or muddy!) but it's not something I won't get used to. Simply put, I get the urge to turn it up and enjoy my music when I wear these, and I hear new things in the music that I am already quite familiar with, both really good signs.

    The only con is when the cord bounces around there is a bit of muffled bass sound in my ears; when I walk around I can hear my footfalls and breathing. This is the same effect as wearing tight earplugs and is a reasonable trade off for sound isolating headphones so small.

    These get four stars because there are better sounding earphones out there, though none as portable that are as affordable and include a remote/mic .

    I'm eager to get a new iPod touch (when the 64GB model comes out) and use the remote and mic; currently they are for decoration only. Actually they do help tell right from left ear by feel.

    105 of 124 people found this useful

    Was this useful?

    Flag as inappropriate

  • Apple In-Ear Headphones with Remote and Mic

    5.0

    The Quality of 'separates' for you audiophiles!!!

    Written by PC from CORINTH

    11/02/2009

    At first I was not very impressed. They were bright and lacked base. Then after swapping out my Sennheisers over and over again I realized it was the Sennheisers that had it all wrong, and I was used to it. It became clear to me that it can be likened to someone with a BIG system with lots of punch and someone with separates with gold cables and lots of quality. I was so used to tons of ear shaking base that when I heard clarity, I mistook it for tinny, overbright sound. But as I have used them more and more I find myself saying, "I never realized they put a very slight echo in Nora's voice on this song" or "I didn't realize the cello kept playing once they started singing." These headphones are able to cover every range very well. My Sennhiesers now sound louder, but muffled with all the low tones they are trying to throw out.

    It is like the difference between all the game stations out there. Everyone was fighting to give better graphics, better graphics, until Nitendo said, "Wii." It was the playability that won it over the graphics race. The same can be said for these headphones. Yes, you can find more punch for the money but I know you wont find more clarity and equal response across all the sound spectrum for this price.

    Make sure you have the right tips on and pull your ear up from the top when you insert them. Get a good seal. You need to listen to a few albums to detox yourself from the heavies out there in headphone land and then you realize the real music you bought, not the interpreted drone your other phones were feeding you. At least that is my experience.

    It also goes without saying that, hey, it's Apple's top notch build quality and I don't find flaws in much of their stuff (although they still need to sort out their Bluetooth headset.....sheeeesh)

    It is, at the end of the day, your preference. Like one famous singer said, "If it sounds good, it probably is good." Good luck!

    99 of 121 people found this useful

    Was this useful?

    Flag as inappropriate

  • Apple In-Ear Headphones with Remote and Mic

    5.0

    Apple are the "Shure" thing

    Written by AK from Rotherham

    2/02/2009

    Managed to pick up a pair of these 2nd hand (but unused)for £25. Was curious seeing so many conflicting reviews.

    Coming from using Shure SE530's with my Nano 16GB 4th gen, I wasn't expecting much.

    To my suprise they are fantastic!! The Shure's are slightly better in every department but not by a huge margin and considering the Shures are 4x more expensive the Apple's are a bargain. Nearly as clear as the Shures with nice balanced bass and just as comfy.

    Those saying there poor must not be getting a seal.

    So pleased with these I'm tempted to sell my Shures now & get some cash back.

    84 of 100 people found this useful

    Was this useful?

    Flag as inappropriate

  • Apple In-Ear Headphones with Remote and Mic

    5.0

    Amazing

    Written by DL from Mechanicsburg

    1/02/2009

    For those folks that find the sound lacking bass, they must not be getting a good fit. These are as neutral as any high fidelity headphones should be. They provide extended bass that is very tight and the highs are effortless. They also are much more dynamic that my Sennheiser HD 595's. If you're new to in-ear headphones then you may have to play around with the fit, but once you get it right they are very comfortable to wear and the sound reproduction is exceptional. Highly recommended, especially for the price.

    73 of 79 people found this useful

    Was this useful?

    Flag as inappropriate

  • Apple In-Ear Headphones with Remote and Mic

    5.0

    The best 'phones under $100, bar none.

    Written by JS from Paw Paw

    15/01/2009

    I am 35 years old, and have been a DJ for over 10 years. Sound quality is of the utmost importance to me, whether at home or at work. I have $850 UE custom 7 Pro headphones, and have tried the best available. Clearly, these new headphones from Apple cannot compete with a triple armature, custom-molded set of monitors like my UE's, but let me be to the point.....They are the absolute BEST value at $79.

    Many have complained that there is some external artifacting occuring during use. Hearing the heartbeat, chewing noises overpowering the music, and of course, the cables themselves cause distortion when they rub against eachother or other things. That's going to happen any time headphones are positions so far in the ear canal. Have the cables loose on the head and that problem is virtually eliminated. Neck straps are an easy fix for that.

    Some have said that the music sounds tinny...
    That's because the armatures are not far enough inside the ear canal.

    Some have said that the bass response is marginal, at best...Again, the armatures are not far enough inside the ear canal.

    I think the best thing users can do is encode their music to 320kbps, as opposed to the standard 128kbps that iTunes uses when tranferring CDs. The average song is 8mb, versus 4mb for a 128kbps encoded song, but the sound quality is most assuredly worth it.

    In closing, I am thoroughly pleased with the quality of these in-ear phones from Apple. At $80, one simply can't beat them.

    65 of 67 people found this useful

    Was this useful?

    Flag as inappropriate